Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.-
Is the article unpublished and has it not been submitted for consideration to any other journal?
It is considered unpublished if it has not been published in any printed or electronic medium. It may have been presented as a conference paper at a congress or symposium and appear within the digital repository of papers from the same event (which must be explained in the text, indicating the name of the congress, location, and date), provided that it has not appeared in an edited work. Any situation like this must also be communicated in "Comments to the editor" below. - Have you carefully read and do you commit to fully complying with the journal's code of ethics?
- Have you carefully read about this journal's peer evaluation process and do you agree to submit to it?
- Does the manuscript's topic coincide with the journal's focus and scope?
- Have you carefully read and rigorously complied with the technical, structural, and authorship requirements indicated in the author guidelines? Do you accept that non-compliance with them may be cause for rejection of the manuscript?
- Is the manuscript in Word for Windows format (extensions .doc or .docx), minimum Word 14 version from Office 2010?
- Does the Word file NOT contain identifying data of the author or authors of the manuscript? (Which are entered as Metadata in Step 3.)
- Does the Abstract not exceed 200 words and briefly state: the research objective or question, methodology (informants or sample, study location, data collection and analysis techniques), results (obtained data), and conclusions (main finding discovered)?
- Are the keywords between 3 and 5, with a maximum of 3 words each? Do they refer to areas or objects of study in Cultural Management, academic disciplines, methodological approaches, and theoretical or empirical terms recognized by the scientific community; not places or proper names?
- Is the total extent of the manuscript between 4,500 and 8,000 words (including the abstract, tables, images, and references)?
- Is the writing adequate (grammar, spelling, clarity, coherence)? Have orthographic and style doubts been reviewed in the Diccionario de la lengua española and the Diccionario panhispánico de dudas, both from the Real Academia Española, or their equivalent in English and Portuguese?
-
Are citations and references not included in the conclusions?
(Remember that the conclusions are the concentration of the arguments developed or verified throughout the manuscript. The dialogue with theory and, therefore, the citation of other works to contrast them with the data obtained in the research must be carried out in the discussion section). - Was the APA Manual followed for the writing style of the article, citations, and the references list?
- Does this references list include only the works that were cited within the text and not those that were consulted only?
- Do you declare that the entire manuscript is free of plagiarism (including autoplagiarism) and that all ideas from others are clearly cited?
- Do you declare that for the preparation of the document you followed this journal's policies on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence?
Artículos de investigación
Original and unpublished manuscripts derived from theoretical, documentary, empirical, or applied research processes in the field of Cultural Management and related areas. Submissions must clearly present the research problem, objectives, theoretical and methodological foundations, results, and discussion of findings, supported by rigorous academic argumentation and an explicit contribution to knowledge in the field. All manuscripts submitted to this section will undergo double‑blind peer review.
Ensayos
This section receives texts of a reflective and argumentative nature that present a grounded position on problems, debates, approaches, or processes relevant to Cultural Management and related fields. The essays must develop a clear thesis, a coherent argumentation, and pertinent bibliographic support, with rigorous, critical, and propositional academic writing. All work in this section will be evaluated through the blind peer system.
Systematization of Experiences
Thematic Articles and Essays (peer-reviewed)
Publication of texts that form part of a thematic dossier constructed from specific calls for papers, and that include unpublished research articles with theoretical support, explicit methodology, empirical results, and critical discussion, as well as thematic essays of argumentative reflection that develop conceptual analyses, theoretical positions, or systematization of experiences with solid theoretical foundation. They are evaluated through the double-blind peer review method to guarantee their scientific rigor, originality, and academic quality in accordance with international standards of scientific journals.
Copyright Notice
Córima does not charge authors any fee for the evaluation, correction, editing, publication, and distribution of articles, and commits to disseminating the published works in open-access indexing services and in the various repositories that use Open Archives Initiative-Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) protocols.
Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link the full texts of this journal, provided that it is for an academic purpose and the original source of publication is cited, under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial) license.
Privacy Statement
Córima, Journal of Research in Cultural Management, is committed to protecting the privacy and personal data of authors, reviewers, readers, and all users of the editorial system. Names, affiliations, email addresses, and any other data entered into the system will be used exclusively for the editorial and communication purposes of the journal.
Personal information provided to the journal will not be shared with third parties outside the editorial process unless the data subject has given explicit consent or a legal obligation applies. Information required for scholarly publication, such as author names, affiliations, institutional email addresses, and article metadata, may be visible in published content and in the journal’s records.
The journal manages its information through an online editorial management system, and the data recorded are used to conduct submission, peer review, editing, publication, and communication processes with authors, reviewers, and editors. Data may also be used in aggregated or anonymized form to improve the functioning of the editorial system.
Users may request the update, correction, or deletion of personal data stored in the system when such action is compatible with the nature of the editorial process and the journal’s record-retention obligations. To exercise these rights, users should contact the journal through its institutional email address.
Submission of a manuscript, participation as a reviewer, or registration as a user implies acceptance of this privacy statement and of the data processing described herein.



